On November 11, 2026, TechFlow reported that Aethir’s token-economics update had entered its execution phase. Citing Aethir’s official blog, the outlet said the ATH burn dashboard was live and that daily burns had started. Burns are executed on Arbitrum. What follows is that report’s account, anchored to its publication time, not a later development.
Figures given as of the report
TechFlow relayed these dashboard readings:
- Cumulative ATH burned: 4,364,413
- ATH burned in the latest 24 hours: 629,516
- Burns over the prior week offset 18.48% of total emissions
The item presents those amounts as Aethir’s reported totals. It does not include an independent check of the burn transactions.
What the mechanism is said to do
Daily burn size is set by a formula. The named inputs are network revenue over the previous 730 hours and ATH’s 30-day time-weighted average price. The notice names those inputs and does not publish either figure.
The funds are described as a portion of the network fees customers pay when booking compute. A fixed platform fee has been replaced by a floating network fee. That fee is capped at the value of Cloud Host rewards and can fall to zero if the market is weak. The ATH emission schedule for Hosts is unchanged.
Aethir’s official description, as carried by TechFlow, is that the mechanism directs 25% of protocol fees to burns. The same report says the burn mechanism has passed a CertiK audit and that ATH’s maximum supply remains 42 billion. It also says Aethir first published this token-economics update on October 21.
Claim versus what the notice documents
The update is presented as an operating burn that recycles part of protocol fees and offsets emissions. The November 11 item supports a narrower set of statements.
A dashboard and daily burns are described as live, with the three totals above. Host emissions stay on the existing schedule, so the reported result is an offset—18.48% of total emissions over the prior week—not a reduction in the emission plan itself. The fee that supplies the burns can drop to zero in a weak market, and it is limited by the value of Cloud Host rewards. The 25% allocation and the CertiK audit appear as official statements in the TechFlow account; this item does not include fee totals or the audit report. The formula’s two inputs are defined and left unquantified.
Nothing in the notice shows how large later burns would be if compute demand or the token’s average price weakened. No revenue, TWAP, or fee amounts in currency are stated.
Original report: TechFlow, November 11, 2026, 18:31:23 UTC+8.
